On Giuliani

"There are exclusive three matters in a Giuliani sentence: 'a noun and a verb and 9/11.'" (A cite from Senator Biden)

New York Times Columnist Maureen Dowd lay it best: "Giuliani needs to conclusion talking approximately 9/11 and ring 9-1-1 in that his Presidential Crusade is in trouble."

On McCain

Last week, I received a feedback from a former professor (a Ph.D. in Physics) who logically defended John McCain's political platform. I tremendously fear the said professor (he once wrote a endorsement send on my behalf) and I grasp him in extremely aerial esteem. As a event of fact, I hog 'to dig deep' to counter the virtuosity of his arguments.

In Physics, we learned that 'natural laws' (at least our sensitive and education of said laws) are not constant and not absolute. Adore in every academic endeavor: connatural and social scientific laws should drive finished the crucible (debates, investigations, experiments and tests) passion prerrogative gold based on their respective adamantine foundation of dope and scientific/historical accuracy. Provided there should be a discovery of 'base metal' after going nailed down the crucible, then the laws should be evolved to echo 'the burgeoning of knowledge.' (Otherwise, we would be guilty of suppressing academic ability and supporting censorship: which leads to tome burning [not publishing sound academic works]; 'witch-hunting' ['the litmus test'], and 'the burning at the stake' [via economical/physical violence]). For example, Newtonian Physics were evolved by Einsteinian Physics (in particular, The Usual View of Relativity); Einsteinian Physics were evolved by Bohrian Physics (in particular, the Bohr-Einstein debates on Quantum Mechanics), and Bohrian Physics were evolved by Susskindian Physics (in particular, Leonard Susskind's Folder Theory).

In McCain, you boast a candidate who testament not compromise on principle: the regulation that combat solves everything - bloodshed is the 'unified area theory' of politics - war conflict is 'the belief of everything' in politics. Perhaps, McCain is a prisoner of his conviction since warfare is the one shot effects he knows - as he admitted to Tim Russert on Fit the Press: "I don't apperceive even about the economy on the contrary I'm reading Alan Greenspan's cutting edge book." What's in Alan Greenspan's current book? Here is an excerpt: "The U.S. went to hostilities in Iraq motivated exceptionally by oil." (Alan Greenspan failed to add the neoconservative's ideology inspired rationale for the Iraq War).

Unlike physicists, McCain's stubbornness would resist any evolution (via the enlargement of knowledge) of his stance on war: "Knowing what I notice just now about the default of WMDs in Iraq and the need of Saddam's connexion to 9/11, I much comprehend the Iraq Struggle is justified." McCain is bound to his misplaced code agnate the Neoconservatives is bound to their nefarious ideology and the Vatican was bound to its former dogma: "the sun rotates encircling a apartment lodgings earth."

Let's borrow from the Torah, wasn't Magnate Solomon - the wisest, most creative and richest workman - a adult of peace? Let's borrow from the Bible, isn't the Antichrist going to conquer the apple via the pretext of appearing as a human race of peace? All the more the Antichrist (Evil Incarnate) knows that 'peace' is the way.

Out of principle, I cannot back the candidacy of John McCain. After all, I'm married to the rule of 'change.'

On Romney

"In the U.S., all religions are not created equal." (coined by yours truly, Karl A. Mitchell)

Besides his Mormonism, Romney has an figure issue which he began to label by 'dressing down' in Florida. Pat Buchanan summed up my speck best: "Romney looks approximative the Stool of the Sovereign state Club who decides on your eligibility for membership or the guy (C.E.O.) who's handing away the pink slips to the workers in the in fashion recession. He looks allying the classical child in college whom your humongous would persuade you to emulate. "

On Huckabee

"For what will it income a mortal whether he gains the solid earth and forfeits his soul? Or what will a subject bequeath in alter for his soul?" (Matthew 16:26 from the Advanced American Morals Bible [ 1995])

In an earlier essay, I commented that Huckabee is divorcing himself from the Strike Bender (a.k.a., Neocons). So all the more for my optimism, he flipped liking a cheap trick (selling his soul, er, himself to the Strife Party) during the Florida GOP Debates. There was Huckabee comparing the lost WMDs to mislaid Easter eggs (a paraphrase): "...because Easter eggs cannot be commence doesn't niggard they weren't planted; the WMDs could've been moved to Jordan." Doesn't he sound prize Rumsfeld in one of his dishonourable 'Rumsfeld speaks?' I blame myself whereas I should've followed my imagination instead of my heart, chiefly when he misspoke on the geography of Pakistan - worse than George W. Bush not cognizant the label of the contemporary bellwether (Musharraf) of Pakistan when he was quizzed by an interviewer during his ahead gallop for the Presidency.

Besides, shouldn't a self-proclaimed Christian pastor be preaching about 'the Crucifixion and the Resurrection' of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, rather than preaching about Pagan inspired Easter Eggs?

On the Ace Physician Ron Paul

"If I say with the tongues of men and of angels, nevertheless cause not acquire love, I keep incline a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal." (1Corinthians13:1 from the Virgin American Criterion Bible [ 1995])

Like the prodigal son, I corner returned to Ron Paul's camp. I'm a upholder in his non-native policy.

But, Karl, what about his private policy?

Like the above quote, the other candidates (better speakers and preferable equipped on pet policy) missing my referendum owing to of their stance on foreign policy. Lest you forget, I argued in an earlier composition (Guns vs. Butter) on the connection between tame policy (the Economy) and foreign policy (the Iraq Enmity and other neoconservative contention crimes, er, misadventures): the U.S. economy is undermined by our misplaced foreign policy.

Very well, Karl, what determine you accept to state about the excellent Doctor's racist background?

Neoconservative rags reported that Ron Paul's former manager of staff published racist articles in a namesake newspaper/newsletter. Ron Paul's duty maintained that he didn't admit any familiarity of the racist articles that were published by a former disgruntled worker until he was approached by the Media on the matter.

Do you purchase his line? In other words, what is the continuous of your gullibility and naпvetй?

Well, I dab to living by the code: "to wrong is human and to forgive is divine." If we are able to forgive the big ranking Democrat and West Virginia U.S. Senator Robert Carlyle Byrd for his former membership in the Ku Klux Klan (K.K.K.), then we should be able to forgive Ron Paul's alleged racist misdeeds. What's more, the Neoconservative media failed to equip the evidence and/or irrefutable arguments connecting Ron Paul to the articles. Let's be convinced about it, are we able to connect the Clintons to their surrogates' (both Coal and White) race/religious card baiting in their campaign against Obama via indeniable evidence or unassailable arguments? I expect not; the jury is yet out, so until it is proven otherwise: Dr. Ron Paul, you're the choicest of the Republican pack.