In Oct 2003 the cardinal year in the Permanent Representative of the Syrian Arab State and Chairman of the Arab Bevy at the United Nations at the time, sent a packages to the Head of the state of the UN Security Council calls upon the Council to examine the Israeli violations of international code and international humanitarian decree (Treaty of the Hague in 1907 and the Fourth Geneva Corporation of 1949) to Background govern the duty of Israel building a wall of apartheid, based on the announcement submitted by a comittee headed by John Dugard, the Accepted Meeting of the United Nations has dispatched to concede the human rights location in the Palestinian territories occupied in that 1967, mainly the incision on building the wall.

UN Security Council, as is the footing in everyone would look the policy of Israel stood helpless since of barriers and obstacles, developed by the U.S. governance in its way. Thus was going to the United Nations Universal Assembly to excogitate those violations. In the example of this buzz session was held Twenty-third of the emergency certain session of the Regular Assembly in Dec of that year and decided, in spite of the opposition of the U.S. polity and the Polity of Israel to examine the International Court of Judge to cater an advisory view on the legality of Israel building a wall on occupied Palestinian territories.
After deliberations was broken by political conflicts, diplomatic and legal manoeuvres and witnessed frequent disruption of the intent concerned was formed in the International Court of Justice. During the half year of iron effort if the Court advisory opinion, an conjecture (fatwa), which came enhances what went Professor South African and international code professor John Dugard's report of the Comission on Human Rights at the United Nations, which is arguable when the complexion of the security wall by the Israeli allegations and stressed Which represents a flagrant violation of human rights in the Palestinian territories, as confirmed that approximately 210 thousand Palestinian citizen testament aware in the sphere between the wall and the method between the Armistice Borderline in 1949 in intact isolation from schools and workplaces, clinics and health services and other social services, which very confirmed That Israel would sincere completed the wall management over Palestinian inundate resources. According to a report by John Dugard, "Israel built the wall will in reality includes most of the Western operation of aquifers, which includes 51 percent of the means of West Bank water" and that the wall will be presented for destruction during the early stages of building an estimated one hundred thousand acres of productive agricultural land In the West Bank and the wall will "introduce vandalized during the early stages of building an estimated one hundred thousand acres of fecund agricultural land in the West Bank and would squander and dispatch comprehensive amounts of belongings and isolate the Palestinians from their agricultural lands, waters and groundwater funds of livelihood."

International Court of Authority was thus standing in front of a specialist's feeling of international constitution professor notorious for his experience, ability and impartiality. Provided we add to this report, which addresses the point of the wall in terms of the threat of dirty deed clearly on human rights, all pleadings submitted by the bodies of Palestinian and other Arab and international all over the wall, the arrangement reached by the Court in its advisory idea was completely unexpected. This opinion, which demanded the court from which the Sovereign state of Israel to suspend interpretation of the wall and demolish what has been done to redress the damage caused by construction and demolition operations as well.

In determining the position of the wall would be helpful to come back to dotage ago to shed some flashing on the policy of the Government of Israel in this context. Anyone here esteem that the thought of building the wall came in response to the events of the al-Aqsa intifada and independence, in the Palestinian territories after the failure of negotiations at Camp David II in 2000. Crumb to cause with those events and effect the project of building the wall, no connexion between the Defensive Shield "as the Israeli expression and the project of building the wall." Step Defensive Shield "in 2002 should remind us that" the enmity in the safety of the Galilee "in 1982, as fine as the Israeli expression. Architect of the Defensive Shield" and the warfare on the safety of the Galilee "is the same, that is Ariel Sharon, former Israeli Prime Minister." Contention of the safety of the Galilee "were bright In its goals, particulary eradicating the Palestine Liberation Assemblage forces in Lebanon and directed by the Arranging of the political equation in the search for a political settlement with the Palestinians self-rule under the administrative dominion of the population without the land. "Operation Defensive Wall", were not far from the objectives in the political objectives of conflict Safety of Galilee.

The contest was the safety of settlements fighting to weaken the Palestinian companion and push for approval to engage in a political settlement based on autonomy Mohsen or amassed flexibility in the handle of the draft administrative autonomy before, that growth has come to restore to the Palestinian dead-eye "map of the strategic interests of Israel, which situate it on The agenda of the Administration of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1997 by Ariel Sharon, as minister of infrastructure and Yitzhak Mordechai as minister of defence in that government. According to the map of interests that Israel care for its hands 63 percent of the West Bank, including security sector: the early proposition of 7-10 metres fathomless in the sector West Bank along the Armistice Wrinkle in 1949 and the moment a profundity of 20 kilometers west of the Jordan River. At the clock were not the fancy of the wall had been crystallized in the policy of the Likud and the intense right-wing parties, as they were lines of separation (streets and roads) and longitude is the commanding idea. Separation wall Racial in its happening alternative is, in fact, the lines of separation in the interests Alastrtejih map, came to stand united largest parties in Israel, a Likud Carousing and Labour Party, the settlement project complete the wall paints picture of the likely political settlement with the Palestinian side.

By reason of the barrier, which Israel began building in Jun of 2002, at the heighth of the "war of the safety of settlements" or what Israel calls "Operation Defensive Shield" has come in the mould and implementation steps cast environment as the most critical phases of the Israeli expansionist settlement project, the Court of Due process International had not erred appreciation or open-minded in the advisory estimate issued in The middle of summer of 2004, not single in the political side of the estimate or the legal angle of it.

On the political side identified the ICJ advisory conception that the West Bank including Jerusalem in June 1967 borders is an occupied department and not disputed territories and the construction of the wall or the means specified in its tracks, which can be stabilized after an amendment puts a restriction on the conscientious of the Palestinian common people to self - Determination and the go to practise their independent Control of Palestine, a prerrogative protected by international legitimacy resolutions, including resolution No. 181 of the division in 1947, the equitable does not detract from its failure to perform in a well timed style or in succeeding stages. Belief here refute the history Israeli and Israeli position on the individuality of the land, which maintains the authority of Israel by this wall, is in appendix to existence a home occupied West Bank including Jerusalem, are further allocated land resolution 181 of the Nation of Palestine. This political attribute is correct extensive in the ICJ advisory opinion, as flourishing as its effect as hardy as in his legal status. Thus exceeded the legal aspect of the fatwa spotlight the political aspect relates to the condign of self-determination for the Palestinian people, which is trying to Israel by building the wall to impose wide restrictions it.
Beyond that, she has highlighted a fatwa Arab megalopolis of Jerusalem and its surroundings, so I persuaded contrast to the allegation and the Israeli annexation laws, issued by the Knesset, Jerusalem, which Israel built the wall on its territories and in the surroundings, are occupied territories. The Jerusalem as such graduated from the Prosecution Advantage as the important of the administration of Israel, and very certain that Israel is obliged under international humanitarian charter and international human rights principle guaranteeing abandon of access to holy places under its control, which hampered by the failure of other proceedings between the construction of the wall in Jerusalem and surroundings.

Is not light to seperate the political and legal aspects of the ICJ advisory opinion, however, can divulge that the fatwa in the legal aspect relating to the labour of building the wall are clearly specified that the route of the wall, Israel has chosen not imperative and is not convincing to complete the goals of a security wall, according to theory Court, the highest judicial governance of the United Nations, is on track and regulations accompanying him is a businesslike incursion on the rights of the Palestinians, can not assert the abuses resulting from the wall and the system of military necessity or the requirements of governmental security or regular distribution Israeli-Israeli conflict.

It asked the International Court of Decree Territory of Israel to end operations now construction, demolition and emigration of what has been done construction duty as a flagrant violation of international law. It and demanded Israel as an occupying Faculty to dispense compensation, or extended exactly and craftsmen as fatwa, repairing the harm caused with construction and demolition operations together. Beyond that called advisory idea of the International Tribunal and in specific the United Nations Typical Assembly and Security Council in search procedures must be done to speck the felonious locality resulting from the construction of the wall and establishment of a register of damages to invoice for this purpose, as it called on all member countries of the United Nations and non-member non-recognition of the status - Legal resulting from the construction of the wall and to chorus completely from any political or diplomatic succour or info for the Kingdom of Israel in this regard. As for damages, which speaks of the ICJ advisory opinion, they are not confined to the damage to personel or damage as physical and as, where talking words 163 of the fatwa on (all) damage, which income the damage caused to individuals, control lands and territories of Awqaf and area municipal councils And local, provincial and communal land, pastures and commonplace resources, especially moisten sources and popular property and infrastructure and those that sustained social and health services, educational and other

The United Nations suspended by the Usual Assembly in besides than one process in front of Israel's policy and the ICJ advisory opinion. That was in Jan the aboriginal of the year 2003 and in July of the year 2004 as firm to adopt the Court's impression in a opt of 150 in December of 2006 where a majority of 164 trustworthy to enact the Job of the Society Register of Accounting and irreparable damage.

Despite this, Israel continues the policy of the Branch Midday of the United Nations and the international regional and linger to advance the wall on Palestinian land. According to estimates by international organizations and bodies, including those affiliated to the United Nations Labour for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Oca), as bright-eyed as UNRWA, Israel has completed 66 percent of the building wall, while functioning continued on 10 percent under construction as of the length of about 723 kilometres , Equivalent to twice the length of the borders in June 1967
According to these estimates, 35 thousand mankind with West Bank name cards, residing in 35 population groups acquisition themselves caught between the wall of the armistice border in 1949, in addition to about 250 thousand of Palestinian people in Jerusalem and its surroundings, which method that the wall will isolate around 285 thousand Palestinian citizen From the West Bank, as great as the regulations governing the besieging about 125 thousand persons residing in 28 gatherings of Scania three rooms and about 26 thousand community residing in 8 localities of the four quarters, and regulations governing other to definitive themselves about half of gate 66 needed to assent the movement Of the occupying forces to own the general public pass.
This is the deed of the wall, that wall of annexation, expansion and rightly considered the most dynamite phases of the expansionist settlement project, implemented by Israel on West Bank territory, including Jerusalem, which intends to deposit hands on some 22 percent of the earth of the West Bank and exert comprehensive curb over the Palestinian groundwater basins, with the exception of Basin in the northeastern governorate of Jenin, which is less important. In addition to the wall in the West unequivocally, a wall of invisible, there is another invisible barrier on the eastern wrinkle of the West Bank a depth of between 15-20 kilometres isolate areas of the Jordan Dale a series of military orders and direction systems, which enable Israel to put hands on as husky as about 23 percent of West Bank territory, in fine measures aimed at shaping a political settlement, which Israel is trying to impose on the Palestinian people, the picture itself, which reflected the maps presented by the Israeli side in the now negotiations between the Palestinian and Israeli sides, which is imposed on the Palestinian guidance occupation in Three directions: front to fit all forms of device to the broad habitual movements against the wall and providing elements of steadfastness of the human beings and to deal with areas of the wall as areas to evolve inaugural class, and the second fresh look of the policy negotiating with the State of Israel and objective contact with it until it stops the authority from continuing its settlement activities and building works Wall and appreciation their obligations in this regard and is dedicated to the implementation of the ICJ advisory opinion, and the third and energy extend to chore terminated the United Nations Work on enter damage to relocate its headquarters from Vienna / Austria to the Palestinian territories and proceed without hesitation to border damage to the wall, which is pursuing the Palestinian Public Register of damage Wall according to its bidding in the presidential statute was issued one year ago.

в * * *

http://www.arabsvip.com/vb/t576.html#post1381